September 2021

22 posts in this archive

Oracles to Women 4 Living in Denial

Rise up, you women who are at ease, hear my voice; you complacent daughters, give ear to my speech. In little more than a year you will shudder, you complacent women; for the grape harvest fails, the fruit harvest will not come. Tremble, you women who are at ease, shudder, you complacent ones; strip, and make yourselves bare, and tie sackcloth around your waist. ​Beat your breasts for the pleasant fields, for the fruitful vine, ​for the soil of my people growing up in thorns and briers, yes, for all the joyous houses in the exultant city. For the palace is forsaken, the populous city deserted; the hill and the watchtower will become dens forever, a joy of wild donkeys, a pasture of flocks; Isa 32:9-14.
            The women of God’s people would not face facts.  They were going to be destroyed.  “Complacent” Isaiah calls them.  “Careless” the King James Version says.  That word means bold and confident.  Despite the facts, despite the preaching of God’s prophet, they did not believe they would be destroyed.  What I call it is “denial,” the haven of fear for some of us, and I have seen it often in my sisters.
            When they do not want to believe that a loved one will soon die, they blame everything on the doctors.  “They” are wrong, they don’t know what they are doing, they listen to the insurance companies too much, they are simply cogs in the big business of modern medicine and don’t care about patients anyway.
            When they don’t want to believe there is a financial problem, they place their confidence in how things have always been.  It never crosses their minds that times might have changed and they might need to cut down their costs of living, actually sacrificing a few things.  They believe that it will only last a few days and then things will be back to normal.
            When a family member or friend, especially when a child has gotten themselves into trouble, the accusers are lying, the teacher just doesn’t like my baby, the police have made trumped charges.  It cannot possibly be that someone I love actually broke a rule or committed a crime.
            Women used to be the strong ones.  When I think back to those hearty pioneers who traveled west, who left most things behind and lived on beans, bacon and flour for months at a time, who built fires for every bit of housekeeping from cooking to cleaning, who carried water several times a day, who worked dawn to dusk, then sat by a dim lamp to darn socks and mend shirts until they could no longer stay awake, I wonder what they would think of the spoiled women of luxury we have become—even those of us who don’t live in mansions and wear designer clothes.  I hear too many say, “I could never do that,” to think we are as strong as they were.  Too many seem unable to face facts, recognizing what needs to be done and doing it without a second thought, no matter how difficult it may be.
            What has happened to us?  At one of the places I spoke several years ago, I mentioned something that had befallen my family, something I had to do that I had never done before and wasn’t sure I could even do.  It was supposed to be an application of Prov 31:25: “Strength and dignity are her clothing.”  One of the women actually spoke up and said, “That’s where I draw the line.  No one could make me do that.”  What?  And so something that needed to be done and no one else was there to do it, would not get done?  And everything would be all right? 
          Denial, false confidence, indifference, complacency, carelessly assuming things would go on just fine.  That’s what those women in Isaiah were doing.  Sometimes you have to be strong.  Sometimes you have to face the facts, no matter how awful they are.  Sometimes you are the one who has to act.  Don’t be the weakling who wrings her hands in despair or sits there confident that nothing is wrong when everything is.  Don’t let this oracle be meant for you.  
 
​The simple believes everything, but the prudent gives thought to his steps. ​One who is wise is cautious and turns away from evil, but a fool is reckless and careless, Prov 14:15-16

 
Dene Ward

Oracles to Women 3 High Maintenance Women

The LORD says, ​​​​​​“The women of Zion are proud. ​​​​​​They walk with their heads high ​​​​​​and flirt with their eyes. ​​​​​​They skip along ​​​​​​and the jewelry on their ankles jingles. ​​​​​​​So the sovereign master will afflict the foreheads of Zion’s women with skin diseases, ​​​​​​the LORD will make the front of their heads bald.” At that time the sovereign master will remove their beautiful ankle jewelry, neck ornaments, crescent shaped ornaments, earrings, bracelets, veils, headdresses, ankle ornaments, sashes, sachets, amulets, rings, nose rings, festive dresses, robes, shawls, purses, garments, vests, head coverings, and gowns. ​​​​​​​A putrid stench will replace the smell of spices, ​​​​​​a rope will replace a belt, ​​​​​​baldness will replace braided locks of hair, ​​​​​​a sackcloth garment will replace a fine robe, ​​​​​​and a prisoner’s brand will replace beauty. ​​​​​​​Your men will fall by the sword, ​​​​​​your strong men will die in battle. ​​​​​​​Her gates will mourn and lament; ​​​​​​deprived of her people, she will sit on the ground.  ​​​​​​​Seven women will grab hold of ​​​​​​one man at that time. ​​​​​​They will say, “We will provide our own food, ​​​​​​we will provide our own clothes; ​​​​​​but let us belong to you – ​​​​​​take away our shame!”  Isa 3:16-4:1.
            God’s people had simply become too wealthy and they were proud of it.  They felt they had earned it.  The women’s obsession with expensive clothing and jewelry, with the self-centered cultivation of their beauty, showed in their facial expressions, in their strutting and flirtatious walks and looks, and were products of an upper class that had never known hard times and hard work.  Somehow, they simply “deserved” it all.
            God promised them punishment suitable to their attitude—diseases that would rob their good looks, the indignity of baldness and stink, and horror of horrors!—not a thing to wear!  Their craving to be noticed would not be satisfied, even if they begged men to take them in, promising to see to their own needs instead of expecting support from him.  Do you see what really mattered to them?  The attention of man instead of God; the carnal pleasures of life rather than the spiritual blessings of being a child of God. High maintenance women indeed—a man could work himself to death and not satisfy a one of them.
            You see them in the church all the time—high maintenance members—and, in my experience, most of them are women.         
            Every need is an urgent need to this drama queen.  She demands more visits, more phone calls, more cards, more mention from the pulpit, in the announcements, in the bulletin, on the webmail, than any ten other people combined.  And what she gets seldom satisfies her.  Instead of telling you how many have visited or called, she will greet you with a list of all who have not.  In fact, she will always call attention to herself when others are mentioned, even if their need is obviously and by far more than hers.
            She is never content, and will carry a list of wrongs against her that goes as far back as her childhood, and mention them whenever the opportunity arises.  Forgive and forget, or simply letting something go, as in “love covers a multitude of sins,” is not in her repertoire. 
            She is especially conscious of status—all of “those people” have it and she doesn’t.  And because “they” look down on her, everyone is against her or “has an agenda.” 
            She resents authority, particularly when it tries to correct her, and is highly critical of others.  She will judge your motives as surely as if she dwelt inside your heart, and dare you to question her conclusions about them.  She will even tell you what you would have done in any given situation—whether you know what you would have done or not.
            If you want her to remain a Christian you have to hold her hand in every situation, comfort, console, pray for, talk to, and serve her every minute or she simply won’t make it—and it will be all your fault!  And by the way, don’t you ever expect any of the same help from her.  It isn’t her “talent.”
            No, you don’t have to be a luxury lover to be high maintenance.  All you have to be is self-centered and shallow, with all the wrong priorities and a sense of entitlement.
            These people, men and women, think they are unique and that only God can really understand them.  They think one of these days He will come and show everyone else who is really in the right.  He didn’t do it for those proud women of long ago.  Why should He start now?
            What these high maintenance people really need is a good dose of Philippians 2:  Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 
            Be careful, ladies. It is far too easy to fall into this bad habit, especially as wealthy and luxury-conscious as we have become in this culture.  And we are oh, so good at it.
           
…with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love…submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ, Eph 4:2; 5:21.

 

Dene Ward

Oracles for Women 2 Manipulators

“And you, son of man, set your face against the daughters of your people, who prophesy out of their own hearts. Prophesy against them and say, Thus says the Lord GOD: Woe to the women who sew magic bands upon all wrists, and make veils for the heads of persons of every stature, in the hunt for souls! Will you hunt down souls belonging to my people and keep your own souls alive? You have profaned me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, putting to death souls who should not die and keeping alive souls who should not live, by your lying to my people, who listen to lies. “Therefore thus says the Lord GOD: Behold, I am against your magic bands with which you hunt the souls like birds, and I will tear them from your arms, and I will let the souls whom you hunt go free, the souls like birds. Your veils also I will tear off and deliver my people out of your hand, and they shall be no more in your hand as prey, and you shall know that I am the LORD. Because you have disheartened the righteous falsely, although I have not grieved him, and you have encouraged the wicked, that he should not turn from his evil way to save his life, therefore you shall no more see false visions nor practice divination. I will deliver my people out of your hand. And you shall know that I am the LORD,” Ezek 13:17-23.
            This oracle has caused a lot of consternation among scholars.  Many of its details are unfathomable beyond educated guesses, and some of them not so educated.  Suffice it to say, these false prophetesses use pagan methods of some sort to deceive people into believing them.  And by their devious methods they “hunt souls.”  Souls who “should not die” die, and souls who “should not live” live.  They are as “prey” in the hands of these women.  In short, these women are master manipulators, and women are oh, so good at it.
            If you haven’t seen that in your lifetime, you are either unobservant or very young.  Even while claiming submission, women can get exactly what they want with the crook of a finger.  I’ve seen “Mama’s boys” tied to their mothers’ apron strings, husbands actually afraid of their wives, and preachers taken down a peg by a loud woman right on the church house steps.  Sometimes there isn’t even a half-baked reason for it; it’s simply women who enjoy exercising their power over others, while at the same time batting their eyelashes and saying, “What?  Little ol’ me?”
            No one should be walking on eggshells around me.  No one should live in fear of my reaction to something they do or say.  Yet I have seen young brides give in to things they did not want on their wedding days just to avoid “hurting” someone—someone who should have asked a bride what SHE wanted instead of just up and doing and expecting it to be accepted gratefully, or someone who simply insisted that she knew best.  Sometimes, often in fact, it is even a member of the family.
            I have seen daughters-in-law practically groveling for a little acceptance from mothers-in-law who were disappointed in their sons’ choices and made it obvious.
            I have seen grandmothers pitting grandchildren against one another for her affection. 
           And all this is as old as the women in the Bible who did the same—Delilah, Jezebel, Athaliah, and Herodias, among others.  Clearly we have a problem with this, ladies, and it’s time we faced up to it and cleaned up our acts.
            We may not be false prophetesses out there to “hunt souls,” but we are certainly false wives, mothers, and grandmothers when we have ulterior motives to our actions.  If I “dishearten” my husband with nagging, with catty responses, with complaints, I am not the wife “who does him good and not evil all the days of his life.”  If I push my children with guilt trips and innuendo, I am not the mother who “opens her mouth with wisdom.”  If I am the woman in the church who is so quick to tell everyone what they need to be doing for her, and in exactly what way or I’ll leave, I am not the servant of the church the apostles so often commend.  If I have to stoop to manipulation in order to be content with who I am, I am not the woman for whom “strength and dignity are her clothing.”
           Submission does not act this way.  Respect does not.  Certainly, love doesn’t. 
 

The wisest of women builds her house, but folly with her own hands tears it down. Whoever walks in uprightness fears the LORD, but he [or she] who is devious in his/her ways despises him, Prov 14:1-2.

 
Dene Ward

Oracles for Women 1

I’ve always found a certain measure of comfort in 1 Tim 2:14:  for Adam was not beguiled, but the woman being beguiled has fallen into transgression.  Comfort, you ask?  Sure.  At least Eve had to be tricked into sinning.  Adam knew it was a sin and did it anyway.
            But I think the bigger point is this:  no matter what our culture tries to tell us, men and women are different.  We have different strengths and different weaknesses.  As you age, dealing with more people in all sorts of situations, it becomes more and more obvious.  In fact, I have come to believe this:  there is nothing worse than a bad woman, but there is nothing better than a good woman.  Women seem to have the capacity for both infinite cruelty and infinite compassion.
            It should also be comforting that most of the oracles in the prophets are aimed squarely at men—they were the ones in control, the leaders who bore the responsibility for how a nation behaved.  So I found it interesting when one commentary pointed out that we do have four oracles specifically to women, and I thought it might be good to explore those oracles and make application to ourselves.  After all, people really haven’t changed.  We are still men and women with the same strengths and the same weaknesses. 
            This week I will post “Oracles to Women 2 through 5” here on the blog.  Let me warn you:  this will not be comfortable.  In order to make an application we can relate to, I will be specific and sometimes brutally honest.  I guarantee you will recognize these women.  You see them around you every day—sometimes in the mirror.  Yet I hope we can all learn to be better by these inspired words from God’s prophets.
 
Every wise woman builds her house; But the foolish plucks it down with her own hands, Prov 14:1.

 

Dene Ward

Hannah and Eli

I am sure that most of my readers are familiar with the story of Hannah, a barren woman who prayed for a child and vowed to give him back to God.  And she vowed a vow and said, “O LORD of hosts, if you will indeed look on the affliction of your servant and remember me and not forget your servant, but will give to your servant a son, then I will give him to the LORD all the days of his life, and no razor shall touch his head (1Sam 1:11).  Hannah also included in that vow taking her child to the tabernacle to serve as soon as he was weaned.  And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, along with a three-year-old bull, an ephah of flour, and a skin of wine, and she brought him to the house of the LORD at Shiloh. And the child was young (1Sam 1:24).
            Granted, weaning in those days took place much later than in our culture.  Age three to five was the standard, but I have read in one source that it could occasionally be stretched to age 8.  (I don't remember where I read that.)  I would never ascribe my own feelings to Hannah, but I would say that if I were her, I would have not been in too much of a hurry!
            But here is something to think about today:  Who was she leaving this young child with?  Eli, the high priest.  Sounds like an excellent mentor, doesn't he?  But Eli himself had not done such a good job with his own sons.  Now the sons of Eli were worthless men. They did not know the LORD (1Sam 2:12).  These men were priests mind you, who disobeyed God's directions on dealing with the sacrifices that people brought.  Chapter 2 goes on to describe that and then says this, Thus the sin of the young men was very great in the sight of the LORD, for the men treated the offering of the LORD with contempt (1Sam 2:17).  And this might not have been the worst of it.  Now Eli was very old, and he kept hearing all that his sons were doing to all Israel, and how they lay with the women who were serving at the entrance to the tent of meeting (1Sam 2:22).  Notice:  everyone knew what they were doing.
            In case you were wondering, Hannah and her family lived in Ramathaim (1:1), the Old Testament name for Arimathea in the New.  My Bible map shows it to be less than 20 miles from there to Shiloh where the sanctuary stood in those days.  Certainly close enough for news to travel.  Now you are Hannah and you realize the kind of men Eli's sons are, men he raised himself.  What are you going to do with the child you have promised to take and leave there?
            The first thing to notice is that Hannah did not use this as an excuse to go back on her vow to God.  She made the vow, her husband allowed the vow to stand, and that settled it.  But I bet not a day went by that young Samuel did not hear the Pentateuch quoted in his home.  I imagine his mother and father both taught him every moment they had, and even made sure to make those moments happen.  They knew that not only would they not be there to teach him, but the influence he would be surrounded by would be less than optimal, to put it mildly. 
            After Samuel arrived, God required the lives of those three men within a few short years, the father and his two wicked sons.  (I am not certain how old Samuel was at that time.  Josephus says he was 12 when Eli died, but Josephus did not live then and, although he is considered reliable in the period between 100 BC and 100 AD, for the very early Jewish history he only repeated the historical traditions.  Numbers 4:3 says that a man could not serve as priest until he was 30, and Samuel was not only prophet and judge, but also priest eventually.  That might mean that the people lived without a high priest for a period of time or perhaps another Aaronic descendant stepped up.  We simply do not know.)  Samuel lived several years in that wicked atmosphere after his mother took him there.  Yet he turned out a righteous man.  Hannah, unlike Eli, did her job and did it well.
          What we seem not to realize is this—we are in exactly the same situation as Hannah.  Sooner or later we will turn our children over to other influences, whether public school or even a religious private school, and eventually a university probably.  And that does not count the even earlier influences of society in the things they see on television, or the things they read, or the video games they play, or any number of other things.  Are you diligently preparing them for that time?  Will they be able to see wrong and know it is wrong?  Will they be strong enough to be different from their peers, even revel in the difference as Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego did? 
            Time flies faster than you think.  I am sure those early years flew for Hannah.  They are flying by for you as well.  Remember that before it is too late.
 
Then the LORD said to Samuel, “Behold, I am about to do a thing in Israel at which the two ears of everyone who hears it will tingle. On that day I will fulfill against Eli all that I have spoken concerning his house, from beginning to end. And I declare to him that I am about to punish his house forever, for the iniquity that he knew, because his sons were blaspheming God, and he did not restrain them (1Sam 3:11-13).

 

Dene Ward

Essential Oils Are Not Essential

Imagine my surprise when I went to a workshop on essential oils and the speaker opened her presentation with that statement.  Quickly she went on to explain, and I have appreciated her even more as a sister in Christ since then.
            This young woman uses the oils.  She enjoys them in her bath, on her skin, and diffused in the air around her.  However, she does not believe that they imbue people with spiritual powers.
            “I am a Christian,” she said.  “What some people claim these oils do for you is done for me through Christ and the Word.  Period.”  Once she began to list the claims, and once I did my own research, I have uttered a hearty amen.
            So what do they claim?  The following is only a partial list, and remember, each of these things is supposed to be “spiritual,” so, for example, when it lists “strength,” it means spiritual strength, not muscular strength.  Keep everything in that context.
            Fennel—perseverance
            Grapefruit—generosity
            Helichrysum—patience
            Myrtle—ability to forgive
            Palmarosa—faithfulness
            Parsley—purification
            Sandalwood—unity
            Pine—humility
            Juniper—sincerity and enlightenment
            Myrrh—spirituality
            Cedarwood—regeneration
            Agrimony—protection
            Chamomile—spiritual awareness, inner peace
            Bay laurel—confidence
            Bergamot—joy
            Cinnamon—love
            Angelica--comfort
            (www.mauldinfamily1.wordpress.com, “mama bear musings”)
This isn’t even half the list, but it contains most of the “spiritual blessings” these oils are supposed to impart. 
            Some people also ascribe “magical” powers to essential oils.  Magic?  Yes, as in potions to protect you and grant you good health and good luck or to put a hex on one’s enemies.  This is exactly how the pagans used oils in ancient times, as indicated by many of the Bible verses that condemn the practice of such “magic.”   Remember too, that most of the verses used to claim Biblical authority for using “essential oils” at all are referring to plain old olive oil, the stuff you and I cook with.  Yes, other oils are mentioned by name, but with the exception of the table of incense in the tabernacle and the Temple, I could find none used in the worship of God.  (Please show me if I am wrong.)
            Before we get to this matter of spiritual benefits, let’s clear up a couple of other things.  Proponents of essential oils say that they were used in Biblical times and were even found in King Tut’s tomb.  Let me quote:  “…aromatic materials were used in Biblical times…but these materials would not have been essential oils, at least not by today’s definition of being steam distilled products.”  Steam distillation was not even invented until the 11th century, over 2000 years after King Tut’s death.  (www.weedemandreap.com, “10 Essential Oil Myths vs Fact” by Dr Robert Pappas)
            Others lean heavily on the fact that the wise men brought frankincense and myrrh to the house where the toddler Jesus was living in Bethlehem.  Besides these gifts having more to do with the nature of the Messiah as the future king, priest, and sacrifice, it probably financed, along with the gold, the flight to Egypt that the poor, newly married couple had to make to save their child’s life.  And, as quoted above, it wasn’t even the same thing as those two materials today.
            As for the “magical” properties, I seriously hope I don’t have to say much about that.  Those things are condemned in both the Old and New Testaments not just as sins, but as “abominations to the LORD.”  No Christian should ever believe such things or use these oils in that way.
            For those spiritual properties, let’s examine the scriptures.  In no particular order:
2 Cor 5:17—God has made us new creatures in Christ (regeneration)
Rom 12:5—we have unity in Christ (and many more passages)
2 John 1:3—we have grace, mercy, and peace through God and Jesus Christ
2 Cor 2:17—sincerity shows when one speaks in Christ
Phil 2:1—encouragement and comfort are found in Christ
Eph 3:12—we have boldness and access with confidence through our faith in him
Eph 1:18—Paul prays for our enlightenment, in this context, in him
1 Pet 1:22—we are purified by our obedience to the truth
Gal 5:22-26—the fruit of the Spirit (love , joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control) comes when we put to death the deeds of the body and are led by the Spirit, a very good definition of spirituality.
And should anyone still be doubtful, Eph 1:3—God has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing.  “Every” should cover anything I missed in the lists above.
            If I need these oils in order to be able to forgive someone, why didn’t God make sure I knew about it in His Word?  In fact, He does tell me that if I do not forgive I will not be forgiven, so this is a serious matter.  If I need some sandalwood in order to have unity, why weren’t the first century Christians told to find some and use it?  Their unity, Jesus said, would make the world believe.  Are we consigning people to Hell because we don’t have any sandalwood in our assemblies?  If I need parsley for purification, surely God would have told us that it wasn’t just the blood of Jesus that purified us.  I think you can probably see my point by now.
            When the Jews started relying upon horses, chariots, political alliances and false gods, God destroyed them.  I think you can add essential oils to the list if they are being touted as “necessary to purification and spirituality.”  Even if we believe they just “help,” we are on dangerous ground.  When God supplies something, it’s enough.
            If you enjoy using essential oils in your own home, please do so.  I enjoyed passing them around and smelling them.  And it certainly was an eye-opener to me about how generous those wise men were with their gifts.  One ounce of frankincense (that’s 2 tablespoons) was listed at $97.00.  I believe they brought Jesus far more than one ounce (and remember it was NOT exactly the same thing).
            But if you claim to be a disciple of our Lord, you need to be careful what you believe about these things.  You owe it to Him to make sure that your companions do not tar you with the same brush as those who make unscriptural claims.  They need to hear that while you may enjoy these oils you worship the Creator, not the creation. 
Do not undermine the all-sufficiency of Christ by claiming that these oils can do for anyone what he does for those who are “in him.”  It’s nothing less than blasphemous to say that “essential oils” can impart the same spiritual blessings that He can.

 
Now may the God of peace who brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, the great shepherd of the sheep, by the blood of the eternal covenant, equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen. Heb 13:20-21

 
Dene Ward

Love Expressed as Hospitality--Part 3 in the Series "Loving the Brethren"

Today's post is by guest writer Lucas Ward.

1 Peter 4:7-10
  "The end of all things is at hand; therefore be self-controlled and sober-minded for the sake of your prayers.   Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins.  Show hospitality to one another without grumbling.  As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace."

 
            The first thing to note about this passage is the reason Peter gives us this instruction and the urgency behind it.  "The end of all things is at hand."  Peter clearly didn't mean "soon to happen" because it has been 2,000 years and the end hasn't happened yet, but for millenia people were looking forward to the coming of the Messiah and now that He has come there is nothing else happening  between us and the end.  The end is the next big event and all we know about it is that it will be a surprise: "like a thief in the night".  Given that, we need to be ready.  Peter tells us three things to do:  be self-controlled, sober minded to prayer, and love one another earnestly.  Peter emphasizes that of these, love is the most important.  "Above all" love one another.  Love is then broken down into two endeavors:  covering a multitude of sins and showing hospitality to one another.  Right now, I want to focus on hospitality.
 
In the 20th and now the 21st centuries we have come to think of hospitality as having people over for dinner or socializing with each other in a variety of ways.  That really has nothing to do with the concept of hospitality current at the time Peter wrote his epistle.  Which is not to say that getting to know one another socially is not important.  One of the first things we learn about the early church is that "day by day . . . breaking bread at home, they took their food with gladness and singleness of heart" (Acts 2:46).  They were in each other's homes; they got to know one another.  Also, how am I supposed to "consider one another to provoke to love and good works" if I don't know my brethren any better than nodding at each other on Sundays?  So socializing is important, but it is not what Peter meant by hospitality.
 
            I looked up hospitality in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE).  Hospitality was a duty in the ancient days when travelers had nowhere to stay and hosts often took in strangers and cared for them.  It was considered an honor to be allowed to provide in this way.  According to the ISBE there were four main components to hospitality:
1) The traveler is made the literal master of the house during his stay.
2)  The host performs the most servile offices for the traveler and won't even sit in the presence of the traveler.
3)  The guest is given use of all the host owns, including even the host's wife and daughters.  (This last bit is not Biblical nor condoned in any way by Biblical teaching, but it does show the devotion the ancients had to hospitality.)
4)  The host is duty bound to protect the guest from all dangers that may arise during his stay.
 
            We have Biblical examples of all these precepts. Which is not surprising since hospitality was held in such high regard that Job defined his righteousness in part by his devotion to hospitality (Job 31:32). 
            In Genesis 18:1-8 we have the story of Abraham showing hospitality to three strangers.  He runs to meet them, begs for the right to serve them and, despite promising only a drink of water and a bit of bread, provides cakes made with the finest flour and a young calf cooked up right -- think veal -- as well as milk and butter.  While they are eating, Abraham stands by ready to serve.  He doesn't join them in eating in his own tent, he stands by like a servant. 
            In Judges 19 a Levite is traveling and when he gets to a Benjaminite town, no one will take him in.  He is so desperate and angry that when someone finally speaks to him, he offers to pay his own way for the right to not sleep in the streets, which normally would have been an insult.  The older man speaking to him says, "Peace be unto thee; howsoever let all thy wants lie upon me; only lodge not in the street." (vs. 15-21)  While the town failed in its duties, the old man accomplished hospitality by providing for all the needs of the traveler. 
            Then a truly shameful thing happens (vs. 22-23).  The men of the city try to attack the traveling Levite.  True to his duties as host, the old man steps out and faces the crowd, protecting his guest:  "do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into my house".  If this sounds familiar it is because it is an almost exact replay of what happened in Sodom when Lot tried to protect the men who were staying with him.  In both cases the women-folk of the host were offered to the mob in an effort to protect the guests.  Again, this is not condoned by the Bible, just reported as having happened, but it does also show how seriously these hosts took the duty to protect their guests, using whatever means necessary. 
            So, hospitality as defined for us by those four principles and shown to us by many Biblical examples is what Peter is telling us to do in 1 Peter 4:9.  Not to be good to strangers, though, he says to show hospitality "to one another".  The ASV says "among yourselves".  So we need to adapt these principles to our relationships with our brethren.
1)  The guest becomes master of the house.
            Galatians 5:13 tells us that we should "through love be servants one to another".  So I should be acting as if my brothers are the bosses and I provide their needs.  Phil. 2:4 reminds us not to look out for ourselves but to look out for the needs of our brothers.  If everyone does this, all will be taken care of, and we will be showing hospitality.
2) The host performs the most servile offices for the guest.
            Washing guests' feet was among the most demeaning services rendered and the task was usually given the servant with the least status.  That shows why the Apostles were so shocked when Jesus began washing their feet in John 13.  He then explains, "If I then, the Lord and the Teacher, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another's feet." (vs 14). In other words, there is nothing my brother might need from me that I am too important to do.  Repeat: THERE IS NOTHING MY BROTHER MIGHT NEED FROM ME THAT I AM TOO IMPORTANT TO DO.
3) The guest is given access to all the host owns.
            1 John 3:16 says we ought to be willing to die for our brethren.  Rom. 8:32 says that God, having already sacrificed His Son for us is willing to give us anything else we might need.  If you put those concepts together then if I am willing to die for my brothers is there anything short of dying that I'd withhold from them?  In a way, even to the point of sharing your spouse.  Ask any Elder's wife or preacher's wife if she doesn't share her husband with the church.  And some husbands, whose wives are the older women who teach the younger (Titus 2) or who are best at weeping with those who weep also share their spouses with the church.  Why do these brothers and sisters put up with the disruptions to their home life?  Because they are showing hospitality through love.
4)  The host is duty bound to protect the guest from all dangers.
            If I am to protect my brethren from dangers and I know there is a lion stalking the earth trying to eat them (1 Pet. 5:8) what should I be protecting them from?  Isn't it my responsibility as a hospitable brother to do what I can to protect my brethren from the temptations Satan attacks us all with?  Certainly I shouldn't be putting stumbling blocks in front of them.  (Matt. 18:7)  So, if I usually have a glass of wine with a meal, but I know my brother is a recovering alcoholic, I shouldn't pour him a glass of wine when he comes over for dinner.  I probably shouldn't even drink my glass in front of him.  And while it is every man's responsibility to control his own thoughts and eyes, surely if my sister loves me she won't dress in such a way as to excite illicit thoughts.  Why do you think it is that the most common adjective used to describe clothes these days is "sexy"?  Because those clothes are designed to provoke certain responses.  I submit that no Christian woman OR man should be wearing clothes that are DESIGNED to be sexy.  Attractive? yes.  Nice looking? yes.  Sexy? no.  Not if I love my brothers and my sisters love me.  Or if there is anything else I might do to put a temptation in front of a brother, I need to be willing to give those things up (1 Cor. 8:13).
 
            Loving through hospitality is serving my brethren, giving my all for my brethren, and protecting my brethren.  Important?
 Matt. 25:40  "And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of these my brethren, even these least, ye did it unto me." 


Lucas Ward

September 7, 1979 Sports Channels

For something that is supposed to be the pre-eminent “Sports Channel,” ESPN leaves me remarkably cold—or actually hot.  It was launched on September 7, 1979, at 7:00 pm, EDT, with the first ever telecast of "SportsCenter," to an estimated audience of 30,000.  It was founded by Bill and Scott Rasmussen (father and son) and Ed Eagan.  It may have begun with tractor pulls, Irish hurling, and skeet shooting, but ESPN has had remarkable growth since then, now boasting several affiliated channels and most of the college bowl games, along with the college world series, Major League Baseball games, and Monday Night Football.
            So why don't I like ESPN?  I can count on CBS to replay nearly every play of any significance immediately.  Not just touchdowns either.  They will show the touchdown from several angles, then show the quarterback as he passed, or the line as they opened the holes for the runner, or any other contributing factor.  If there is a penalty, we see it happen.  If there was an excellent block, we see the block.  If a defender made an amazing move around a lineman, we see the move.
            ESPN?  I doubt that even half the plays are shown again.  Instead, we get an interview with someone on the sideline who might possibly have something to do with the game, but more likely doesn’t—he just happens to be famous.  Or we get an update from a game we chose not to watch and have to watch a piece of anyway rather than a replay of our chosen game.  Most of the time, we never get the replay, even if it was a 50 yard run to set the team up with first and goal.
            On ESPN the commentators talk about every game except the one we are watching.  In fact, they sometimes talk about a different sport altogether.  We hear about other players, other coaches, and other schools—anything but the game we are watching.  We are told the records of every Heisman hopeful, even if they are not playing in our game.  We know which coach played for which other coaches, even if they are not coaching our team.  And they can’t even do it with good grammar.
            But sometimes we’re stuck.  It’s the only place we can see our team play—and win, we hope, despite not being able to see the instant replays in a timely fashion and at a meaningful angle.
            I guess a lot of people don’t mind.  They are putting up with the same things at the church they attend.  They say they are Christians but their preachers present sermons about societal ills—the ones deemed politically correct to talk about--about love and acceptance of everything and everyone no matter how many of Christ’s commands they break, and never once mention the name of the Savior they claim to worship—Rotary Club talks, inspirational talks, anything but a sermon.  They are handed pamphlets that some board somewhere else decided they needed to study rather than the Word of God, and certainly nothing actually relevant to that particular group and its needs.  If they learn anything, it’s about another game altogether, not God’s.
            Maybe these folks don’t know what to look for.  They expect entertainment rather than edification, emotion rather than instruction, famous people and rip-roaring religious fervor, along with a meal or two to keep the belly from growling.  Jesus had some choice things to say about people like that.  Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.  Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal” John 6:26-27.  It isn’t about the feel-good physical, he told them, it’s about ME!
            On Sunday mornings, I want to hear about my Lord.  I want to study the Word of God and learn more from it than I knew the day before.  On the other hand, I don’t mind a repeat of an old lesson, perhaps from a new angle, and certainly prefer that to an interview on the sideline with someone who is supposed to be “famous” in the religious world.  Big name preachers can sin the same as the rest of us. 
And you know what?  We CAN turn this channel.  We can look for something else.    You can look for something else.  Give me the simple truth of the gospel and the simple worship of those people long ago.  Why don’t you come with me so we can find it together?  Nothing else can fill your soul quite the same way.
 

I am the bread of life.  Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died.  This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh  John 6:48-51.

 
Dene Ward
 

Is It All Right to Read Something Besides the Bible?

Maybe it's because I have been told in a particularly, pardon my colloquialism, snotty tone one too many times, "I don't read religious books—only the Bible."  Maybe that's why I feel the need to talk about this today.  All of my faithful readers know that I have been putting out at least one book review a month on a book covering some spiritual topic.  Not all of them are written by Christians, but the ones that are not are generally written by experts in their field who know far more about their topic than I do, and who have the intellectual integrity to write honestly.  Many of them well defend things I believe the Bible teaches that I happen to know their own particular denomination's creed does not.  To me that says something good about the author.
            As to why we should not read spiritual books I am at a loss.  Most of these people will admit to reading fiction.  Let's face it.  These days when we read novels or watch television, even when we are very careful what we read or watch, we have to overlook some things.  I have gotten pretty good at reading past words I would never say myself.  In fact, I did not realize that was what I was doing until I began to listen to audio books.  I received shock after shock when those words I automatically elided were suddenly spoken aloud in my ear!  Now if we make allowances in some way for things like that, why can't we do the same for a good book on a helpful spiritual topic that just might have a line or two that we recognize as false doctrine?  I assume that these oh-so-particular Christians do know their Bible well enough to recognize these things and not lose their faith.  If not, why not?
            We have historical documents telling us that Christians as far back as the late first and early second centuries read books on spiritual topics that are not included in the Bible.  Why?  For edification when the book was correct, and to find out what exactly people were teaching when they weren't.  There is mention in the New Testament of other epistles, one written by Paul himself, that were not considered "scripture" and so are not included in the Bible.  As far as reading things by people who were not Christians, we know Paul read pagan writers and quoted or alluded to them (Acts 17:28, Aratus in Phaenomena 5; Titus 1:12,13, Epimenides in de Oraculis; 1 Cor 15:33, Menander in Thais 218).  Other books are mentioned in the Old Testament as well (Josh 10:13; 1 Chron 29:29, etc.).  All of God's people through history have been readers.
            So I keep some sort of spiritual book on hand to read in every day.  No, it is usually not a fast, fun read, but I find I can give it 20-30 minutes easily.  Sometimes I read a whole chapter, other times a section of a chapter.  It depends on the book.  Besides giving me information I would not have had any other way, they also prod me to pick up my Bible even more than I already do.
            If you have missed them, check the right sidebar and click on "book reviews."  I hope they will help you get started in what I believe is a worthwhile experience.
 
When you come, bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas, also the books, and above all the parchments (2Tim 4:13)                                                                                             

 
Dene Ward

September 3, 1878 Death by Swimming

On September 3, 1878, the pleasure steamship Princess Alice, returning from an outing loaded with about 700 passengers and crew, was hit by the coal ship Bywell Castle which weighed over three times more than the steamer, and sliced it in two.  The middle of the boat immediately sank, dooming all passengers below deck in their cabins.  The ends raised up in the air, plummeting the rest of the people into England's Thames River, a heavily polluted waterway, near the point where raw sewage poured out, and not far from several factories which dumped toxic waste into it.  The smaller boat should have stayed closer to the southern shore as was the practice, but tides and currents had gradually moved it to the middle of the river where the larger ship came plowing through.
            No one knows the exact casualty count because there was no passenger list.  Bodies floated to shore for days, and that count stood at around 650 by the time it stopped.  Many drowned because only a few people could swim and even those who could were weighed down by their heavy Victorian clothing, but the coroner stated that the water itself killed the others.  Of those who were rescued or managed to swim to safety, many more died as weeks passed.  While in the river they swallowed enough of its putrid water that they died of serious waterborne diseases—typhoid, cholera, and polio among them.  They may not have died as a direct result of the collision, but they died from simply being in the water.
            I know some brothers and sisters who seem to think that they can swim in putridity and not be effected.  They can go to bars and not drink.  They can go clubbing and not take drugs or participate in sexual immorality.  I know some young ladies who think they can dress however they want to and still lay claim to holiness.  I know some young men who think that as long as they don't do anything with anyone but their wives, they can look at pornography and it won't cause them problems.  All of these people are living in poisonous atmospheres that will gradually seep into their hearts and minds and take them down as surely as those doomed passengers.  Even the ones who thought they were safe died from their brief swim in what amounted to the venom of the serpent.
            What you surround yourself with is important.  If you want to be pure, poison is not going to make you so.  You will wind up not only tainted, contaminated, and infected, you will wind up even worse than dead.
 

Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret (Eph 5:11-12).

 
Dene Ward