For anyone who just happens upon this review: if you are a scholar of Biblical Studies, you want to just skip this. I am no such thing. I just enjoy reading, especially books that will build my own knowledge and understanding of God's Word. That means that sometimes I get hold of a book that is a little beyond me, but that's who I am writing for on my own personal blog—people who are not necessarily erudite but who want to challenge themselves with something that is far above the fluff one usually gets at the supermarket bookshelf or even the chain bookstores.
I am glad I read it after I read the same author's Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels rather than before. This one, the Letters of Paul, actually came out before the other. In it he carefully describes what he is doing and how he goes about it. You would think that would make this one easier to digest, but that was not the case for me. If I had read this one first, I would never have picked up the second one on the Gospels, which I enjoyed and will probably make use of in future Bible classes. This one was so much more difficult that I could barely manage 10-12 pages at a sitting and even halfway understand what I was reading. I looked up the same words again and again and still cannot be absolutely sure that I remember what they mean! Words like adumbrate, metalepsis, kerygma, heuristic, etc.—I have reached the point that if I see them in a sentence I can figure them out, but all alone and out of context? No more than a couple.
If you do want to give it a try, you absolutely must understand that the word "Scripture" has a narrow meaning in the context of this book; here it refers to the Old Testament scriptures only.
Once the author gets into the actual letters of Paul and begins to go back and forth between them and the Old Testament passages they "echo," you really can learn a lot. Most of the things he pointed to I already knew, but he takes it much deeper and sees more than I ever have before. You and I already know and believe what he is trying to prove in most cases. The author is just showing you how you got there, and adding a few details you might have missed.
At the end he seems to be arguing about whether we can take the same "liberties" Paul did in interpreting scripture. Let's face it: you and I are much more simplistic. We believe that the Holy Spirit inspired Paul to see these things whereas Jewish rabbis before him did not. That answers the question for us. But a few things like that do not mean you cannot learn things from this book if you want to try. You had just better be ready to go at it with a figurative pickaxe to mine the gold in it.
Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul is published by Yale University Press.
Dene Ward