Pecan pie is a staple at our holiday table. I found a great (and easy) recipe years ago and have not changed it a bit, which itself is notable. Yet when I found a recipe recently for âthe very best pecan pie,â I decided to give it a try. Pecans, sugar, syrup, eggs, butter, and vanillaâhow can you mess it up?
I dutifully followed the recipe in every detail. The only real difference was the syrup. âCorn syrup is tasteless,â the author said, so she switched to real maple syrup.
âThis had better be good,â I thought as I shelled out seven dollars for one small bottle. It wasnât. No, thatâs not fair. It did not taste awful, but it wasnât pecan pie.
I reread the article. I should have known when I saw the line, âAll you can taste are the pecans,â referring to the standard recipe using corn syrup. Well, it is called Pecan Pie. It is all about the pecans to us Southerners. This magazine was based in New England. What the chef had created was a Maple Nut Pie because suddenly it was all about the maple syrup. You could have added walnuts, hazelnuts, or almonds and not have known the difference. She had completely changed the focus of the pie.
The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, Mark 2:27. Over and over during his ministry, the scribes and Pharisees plagued Jesus with accusations of breaking the Sabbath. Their many rules and regulations, not found in the law, had turned what God designed to be a blessing for man into a burden.
The Sabbath was a day of rest for Godâs people, while the pagan world worked seven days a week just to survive. It was a day when they could see to their spiritual needs, and renew their relationship with God. It was a day of âholy convocation,â Lev 23:3. The many rigorousâand ridiculousâtraditions had made it a day to dread instead.
Jesus reminded them many times that man should be blessed by the Sabbath, that his good should come because of and sometimes even at the expense of the Sabbath. They pulled their oxen out of the ditch. Why shouldnât he heal?
When you change the focus of a law, you often lose the blessing God intended from that law. Staying with the idea of a special day, what about our Lordâs Day? Is it necessary to make it inconvenient in order for it to be sincere worship? Yet, I have heard people argue about changing the times of service in exactly that way. If we have many who come from a distance, and the price of gas has become prohibitive, why canât we meet one time for longer instead of two shorter services without being accused of losing our faith?
Canât you hear Jesusâ reaction? The Lordâs Day is made for man, not man for the Lordâs Day. If inconvenience is what makes it true worship, letâs meet at 3 am.
To make another application, each one of us is responsible for how we view our assemblies, for our focus when we meet. If instead of being a blessing it is nothing more than a rule to follow, then I need to change my focus to Godâs intended one. We are told that our assembling should âprovoke one another to love and good works.â Too many times all we get is provoked, and that is our own fault. Let all be done unto edifying, Paul tells those assembled in 1 Cor 14:26. You canât edify a person who sits there like a rock, who listens to find fault, or who wishes he were somewhere else.
Donât change the focus of Godâs laws. He made them to bless us and help us. When we canât find the blessing, itâs because we are focused on ourselves, our own bad attitudes and evil motives, instead of on serving a Creator who loves us and blesses us, and on brethren who count on us for encouragement.
For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments, and his commandments are not grievous, 1 John 5:3.
Dene Ward
I dutifully followed the recipe in every detail. The only real difference was the syrup. âCorn syrup is tasteless,â the author said, so she switched to real maple syrup.
âThis had better be good,â I thought as I shelled out seven dollars for one small bottle. It wasnât. No, thatâs not fair. It did not taste awful, but it wasnât pecan pie.
I reread the article. I should have known when I saw the line, âAll you can taste are the pecans,â referring to the standard recipe using corn syrup. Well, it is called Pecan Pie. It is all about the pecans to us Southerners. This magazine was based in New England. What the chef had created was a Maple Nut Pie because suddenly it was all about the maple syrup. You could have added walnuts, hazelnuts, or almonds and not have known the difference. She had completely changed the focus of the pie.
The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, Mark 2:27. Over and over during his ministry, the scribes and Pharisees plagued Jesus with accusations of breaking the Sabbath. Their many rules and regulations, not found in the law, had turned what God designed to be a blessing for man into a burden.
The Sabbath was a day of rest for Godâs people, while the pagan world worked seven days a week just to survive. It was a day when they could see to their spiritual needs, and renew their relationship with God. It was a day of âholy convocation,â Lev 23:3. The many rigorousâand ridiculousâtraditions had made it a day to dread instead.
Jesus reminded them many times that man should be blessed by the Sabbath, that his good should come because of and sometimes even at the expense of the Sabbath. They pulled their oxen out of the ditch. Why shouldnât he heal?
When you change the focus of a law, you often lose the blessing God intended from that law. Staying with the idea of a special day, what about our Lordâs Day? Is it necessary to make it inconvenient in order for it to be sincere worship? Yet, I have heard people argue about changing the times of service in exactly that way. If we have many who come from a distance, and the price of gas has become prohibitive, why canât we meet one time for longer instead of two shorter services without being accused of losing our faith?
Canât you hear Jesusâ reaction? The Lordâs Day is made for man, not man for the Lordâs Day. If inconvenience is what makes it true worship, letâs meet at 3 am.
To make another application, each one of us is responsible for how we view our assemblies, for our focus when we meet. If instead of being a blessing it is nothing more than a rule to follow, then I need to change my focus to Godâs intended one. We are told that our assembling should âprovoke one another to love and good works.â Too many times all we get is provoked, and that is our own fault. Let all be done unto edifying, Paul tells those assembled in 1 Cor 14:26. You canât edify a person who sits there like a rock, who listens to find fault, or who wishes he were somewhere else.
Donât change the focus of Godâs laws. He made them to bless us and help us. When we canât find the blessing, itâs because we are focused on ourselves, our own bad attitudes and evil motives, instead of on serving a Creator who loves us and blesses us, and on brethren who count on us for encouragement.
For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments, and his commandments are not grievous, 1 John 5:3.
Dene Ward