If Jesus was only a man, how happened it that the methods he adopted are as unlike the methods of men as the end he sought is unlike the end that any man ever yet proposed to himself? How happened it that in his plans he did everything that a man would not do, and nothing—all history being witness—that a man would do?...Looking at it all as a man might, was there then a single human probability that the cause represented by the crucified Galilean would have the least place in history? That it would abide among men for a single generation? If Jesus was only a man could anything conceivable by the human mind be more impossible than the realization of the dream (if he was only a man, it was but a dream) of this man of Galilee, crucified like a felon?
Man of Galilee by Atticus G Haywood
We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” The man answered, “Why, this is an amazing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes (John 9:29-30).
Man of Galilee by Atticus G Haywood
We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” The man answered, “Why, this is an amazing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes (John 9:29-30).
Comments