Guest Writer

333 posts in this category

Addicts: Everyone of Us!

Today's post is by guest writer Keith Ward.

“Remember not the sins of my youth” -- These are words from a currently popular song, in turn taken from David’s words in Psa 25:7.

Now why should we or David either be worried about sins of long ago –long, long ago for some of us?  We and he repented, we/he confessed, we/he prayed.  We were forgiven—long ago.

But, I confess that the temptations that BESET me are those same sins that started in my youth.  Perhaps in that time of hubris, Satan finds our weakest character trait and attacks and lodges arrows whose tips bedevil us with the pain of sin all our lives.

To illustrate: The popular kids in high school cussed and so did I.  (Shame on me).  I kept that world separate from home and Mom never knew—provable by the fact that the only scars on my hide are bullet holes and various self-inflicted accidental wounds.  I got to college and waxed worse, still leading singing and making talks.  Then I obtained a master’s degree in bad language in the USMC.  I went to Florida College 3 years, preached full time for 10 and part time for years, and have been a deacon for decades.  I cleaned it up.  But when frustration builds up, I still fight the battle over, when multiple things go wrong in a short time and I am tired and, and, and….the words are at the tip of my tongue, in the edge of my mind.  Shame on me.

I wish I could say that is the only sin that began in my youth, battles I still fight too often.  I suspect David was warning young people—don’t start.  It never stops.  The appetites that you do not learn to control now will haunt you all your lives.

For that same reason, Paul warns a middle-aged Timothy, “Flee youthful lusts.”  Old people are bothered by the same temptations that plague young ones.  Problems may vary from vulgar language to pornography to covetous materialism to sexual fantasies to lying to envy, or a host of others, but the principle remains that it is easier to never begin than to stop, easier to stop when you are young than later.  Now is the time.

So, with David and Paul, I would also warn:  Learn now to control yourself.  Every indulgence will weaken you and haunt you all your life.  Not because it is unforgiven but because it never goes away.  Like an addiction, sin/Satan never leaves you alone.  You can control it, but you are never over it.

So you too consider yourselves dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its desires, and do not present your members to sin as instruments to be used for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who are alive from the dead and your members to God as instruments to be used for righteousness. For sin will have no mastery over you, because you are not under law but under grace.  (Rom 6:11-14, NET)

Keith Ward

Job Part 1--Speaking Right of God

This is the first in a series on the book of Job by guest writer Lucas Ward.  Look for this series on the Monday nearest the middle of the month for the next several months.

We must always be careful when making assumptions about God’s intentions.  We can find several examples of times when prophets and apostles both said "who knows, maybe this is what God is doing." If inspired men are unwilling to say definitively what God is doing, then who am I to quickly assert, "God has opened this door for me and is leading me down this path."? 

I think a great example of this is found in the book of Job.  One of the amazing things I have discovered about Job is that his friends' sayings are so often right.  Over and over their arguments parallel the best of the wisdom books.  At least twice Job agrees that their statements are correct in themselves but that they don't apply to him.  For instance, compare Eliphaz's statement in Job 4:7-9 with Prov. 13:21-22. "Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished, being innocent? Or where were the upright cut off? According as I have seen, they that plow iniquity, and sow trouble, reap the same. By the breath of God they perish, and by the blast of his anger are they consumed." and "Evil pursueth sinners; but the righteous shall be recompensed with good. A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children's children; and the wealth of the sinner is laid up for the righteous." They seem very similar, no? Or Eliphaz's description of the fool in Job 5:2-6 and Solomon's in Prov. 13:18-19.  Also very similar.  Most telling, perhaps, is Eliphaz's statement in Job 5:17 "Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: Therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty." That idea is paralleled in Ps. 94:12 and Proverbs 3.  Proverbs 3 is then quoted in Hebrews 12 and the writer expounds upon the idea considerably.  So, the general wisdom statements of Job's friends were good, sound wisdom as understood by Job and backed by God's inspired writers. 

So, then, how were the friends wrong?  Why were they condemned?  The easy answer is that they wrongly condemned Job, that they accused him of sin without evidence and assumed his guilt and attacked him for it. That, however, is not why God said He was angry with them. "The LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite: "My anger burns against you and against your two friends, for you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has." Job 42:7. It is not what they said about Job that was so annoying to God, it was what they said about God that got them into trouble. Yet almost everything they said of God was good, accepted wisdom backed up by other inspired wisdom writers! 

So where did the friends, and Eliphaz particularly, go wrong?  This is a question I intend to pursue as I go on in my study of Job, but here is my first impression of how they went wrong: in trying to fit God into a box.  In assuming that, because they knew some good general wisdom about God's tendencies, they understood exactly what He was doing at all times. In basically assuming that, if God were righteous, He MUST do what THEY thought He ought to do.  If God did otherwise, then He was wrong.  This, I believe, is how they spoke wrongly about God. 

Don't you see how this fits in with the original discussion?  We know quite a bit of good, general wisdom about how God acts.  We know that "all things work together for the good of them that love God."  We know that we "can do all things through Christ who strengthens" us.  We know that God is protecting us, watching over us, and taking care of us.  But when we say, specifically, that God is doing such and such based on these general statements, we are confining God to a box.  We are saying that He must be doing this, because this is what we understand as right, and, therefore, if He is doing something else, then He is wrong. 

Maybe, in a certain situation, He is blessing us or maybe He is testing us to see if we will come to rely on our wealth instead of Him.  We see a door open and assume it is from God, but maybe it is Satan tempting us to go astray.  Maybe these horrible things that are happening to us, which we assume are from Satan, were actually sent by God to make us stronger.  In the end, I know that I'll be better because of what happens in this life (Rom. 8:28) but I need to be careful about assuming I know the mind of God in every instance. That assumption is not one the prophets or apostles were willing to make (“who knows…?”) and it is one that got Eliphaz and his friends in trouble.

Lucas Ward

Raise Them

Today's post is by guest writer Keith Ward.

Our elders offer a thought and lead a prayer at the end of services.  Recently, one commended one of the young men (16?) who had led a prayer at the Lord’s Table earlier. He had not mumbled or rushed it, nor did he just repeat phrases he’d heard from others.

I was not surprised at his ability.  I had watched his mother with him during services from when he was a toddler.  He never had cars and cartoon books that I noticed.  She pulled him in her lap and ran her finger under the words of the songs from before he could read; she insisted that he treat worship as worship and not playtime and he grew up listening and singing.

Parents, fear if your child will not sing.

We had Bible story books that the boys got to look at only at services, or, they could draw, but only Bible stories and after services we would say, “Tell me about this one,” Later, they took notes.  When they got to freshman Bible at Florida College, they were amazed at the things that were being  taught “at college” as they’d known them for years. Maybe those students who were struggling to get “B’s” had Disney books and toys in church.  

Is it a wonder that they know a lot of Bible—one is a Bible professor at FC and the other is a Bible class teacher who does not have to take a backseat in discussions with his brother.

So far as I am aware, the mother above never heard us tell how to do it.  It should be obvious to anyone that God and church are special and you cannot teach that to your children with toys and comic books.  I have known some children who turned out just fine, but please think about what you do and what it is teaching them.  Don’t just try to keep them quiet.

Prov 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it.

Keith Ward

The Gospel According to the Oak Ridge Boys

Today's post is by guest writer Lucas Ward.

There's a black cloud following me around
And I just can't get away
Instead of sinking a little lower
I start making tracks on over
To the place where the sun shines day and night
And I know I'll hear you say

Come on in
Baby take your coat off
Come on in
Baby take a load off
Come on in
Baby shake the blues off
Gonna love that frown away
Come on in
Baby put a smile on
Come on in
Baby tell me what's wrong
Come on in
The blues'll be long gone
Gonna love that hurt away

I've always assumed the Oak Ridge Boys were singing about a bar, but doesn't the description fit exactly the New Testament description of the Church? The church (meaning, of course, the people who meet together under God's auspices) is where we rejoice with them that rejoice; weep with them that weep (Rom 12:15). It's where we go for encouragement (Heb 10:24 and let us consider one another to provoke unto love and good works;) and edification (Rom_14:19 So then let us follow after things which make for peace, and things whereby we may edify one another.) It should also be where we go when we need a kick in the pants (2Ti_4:2 preach the word; be urgent in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching.)

The church is referred to as a family almost 200 times in the New Testament. Where else should we turn when we get "tired and a little lonely" or when "a black cloud is following me around and I just can't get away"? Shouldn't our church family be "where the sun shines day and night"? When we need help and encouragement we should be able to call upon our family and always hear "Come on in". And when members of our family call upon us our only thought should be "gonna love that hurt away."  If yours doesn't work that way, maybe you are in the wrong place.

Lucas Ward

Filling in God's Blanks

Today's post is by guest writer Keith Ward.

Like most government agencies, Florida Department of Corrections has a number of forms to be filled out.  One that inmates must sign for me is totally useless; the purpose for it ended over 10 years ago but we cannot get it removed.  So I hand it and another senseless form (unnecessary but not known to be totally without purpose) to the inmates, with the parts that they need to fill in marked with exes –signature, date, DC# (Department of Corrections number).

The totally useless form has a heading explaining what its [defunct] purpose is, “I _____________......”  This has no X beside it, my attempt to avoid wasting any more time on it than I must.  Inevitably, the inmate will put his name in the blank, or ask whether I want him to do so.  I reply, “Just where the exes are.”  Sometimes, I look at one who has filled it in and say, “I told you, ‘where the exes are.’ ” They always start apologizing.  They know they were not following the instructions when they filled in that blank.

It seems we have the same problem with the Bible, we cannot stand blanks.  Fantastic (as in “fantasy”) books have been written telling what the other apostles did, what Jesus did as a child, what he did between 12 and 30, etc.  Even ancient people got into the act and books were written to fill in the gaps of famous O.T. characters, some purportedly by those inspired men/characters.

As for us, we bind rules where God left a blank.  Or we decide that since God left a blank, we can do whatever suits us.  Numerous passages can be cited to support the radical notion that when God said nothing, that is exactly what he wanted, “Unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my son,”  “Of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priests,” and “In all places where I have moved with all Israel, did I speak a word with any of the judges of Israel, whom I commanded to shepherd my people, saying, "Why have you not built me a house of cedar?"'  And that last one right after God told David, “Thou shalt not build me a house.”  (1 Chron 17).  Several more such could be listed.

Most religious division comes in places where men filled in God’s blanks.  At least the inmates know they did wrong to fill in the blank, but these theologians still argue that they have the right to do so and certainly never apologize.

“That you may learn not to go beyond what is written.” 1 Cor 4:6

Keith Ward

Ol' Reliable

Today’s post is by guest writer Lucas Ward.

Jerry Whitehead has died.  He was only 60, it was sudden and unexpected.  For those of you who don't know him, Mr. Whitehead was the Sheriff of Union County, where I grew up.  Not only was he the sheriff, he had been the sheriff since 1985.  For 28 years he had been the top law enforcement officer of our county.  He was a good man, friendly and kind.  He coached me in Little League baseball.  The people of the county were comfortable knowing that Mr. Whitehead was looking out for things.  I imagine that there are people in their early forties who don't remember a time when Jerry Whitehead wasn't the sheriff.  They relied on him.

And now he is gone.

It just goes to show that we can't rely on anyone in this world.  Some people we trust let us down because they aren't the people we thought they were.  Even the people of the highest integrity, however, can't be relied upon to always be there, because one day they will be gone, just like Jerry Whitehead.  Everyone gets old and too weak to keep up their previous pace.  Everyone we look up to will eventually die and leave us holding the bag with others looking up to us.  And then we, too, will be gone.

In this ephemeral world, however, there is one thing I can rely on:  Luke 21:33 "[Jesus said] Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away."  I can rely on the teachings found in the Bible.  I can trust on His word to lead my life.  I can count on the promises recorded therein.  Because of His recorded Word, I can know my God and what He expects of me.  I can know of the great salvation He has wrought for me and what my responsibilities are regarding that salvation.  Despite the changes of public opinion and popularity, His Word never changes.  I can base my life on it and I can be secure.

Mat 7:24-25 "Every one therefore that hears these words of mine, and does them, shall be likened unto a wise man, who built his house upon the rock: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon the rock."

Lucas Ward

Law Keeping = Idolatry

Today's post is by guest writer, Keith Ward.

The Galatians had been told they must keep the Law of Moses in order to be saved.  Paul worked to persuade them that the power of the gospel was sufficient and was, in fact, negated by keeping the Law for salvation.  His argument in 4:9 startles us when it equates keeping the Law of Moses with idolatry, “But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world, whose slaves you want to be once more?”  These Galatians had never been under the Law of Moses; how could they “turn back again” to it, or be “slaves once more”?  They had been idolaters with various rules for worship and finding God.  Since the gospel became the power of God to salvation, seeking justification by keeping the Law of Moses is no different than seeking justification by keeping the ordinances of idolatry.  Both involve various outward rules one meticulously keeps in order to come to God by things men do rather than by faith.  To turn from the gospel to the Law of Moses would be no different that turning from the gospel to idolatry.  [Those who were justified during the dispensation of the Law of Moses were justified by faith as noted in Hebrews 11 as men were in every dispensation.]

It would be appropriate to apply this passage to those who turn to the O.T. to justify their practices: incense, instrumental music, priests, tithes.  But, it may be more useful to search within ourselves, “Has my service become a matter of rituals instead of a living sacrifice?”

When attendance becomes a measure of faithfulness and Hebrews 10:25 is a club to enforce it, does it really even matter whether one attends or not?  Where is the heart?  Is one serving God or his own rules?  Attendance is not a “rule;” it is the opportunity one has to “provoke unto love and good works” his brothers and sisters.  Checking a duty off the list is self-serving and does not follow the example of Christ to serve others.

When one prays to fulfill a duty it maybe has a limited value.  But, it does not even approach prayer that opens the heart to God, prayer that draws one closer to God, prayer for others, prayer for service.

Some give on the first day of the week only because it is one of the “5 acts of worship.” Others first give themselves to the Lord and then give beyond their means of their own accord.

Eph 5:19 has been relegated for a proof text against instrumental music in the worship assembling.  Paul wrote it in the context of everyday living as a primer for filling oneself with the Spirit. (The Greek does not say “one to another” but is a totally different word that is reflexive, “speaking to yourselves”).  Is it any wonder that we struggle in our daily lives since we are empty of the Holy Spirit because we do not sing in our hearts all the time?

Many have turned the grace of God into rituals, rituals that no longer have the N.T. purpose and heart.  There seems to be little difference between a will-worship by means of idolatry or one by means of Old Testament rules, or even by means of instructions of grace to help in time of need which have been turned into a checklist.
 
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery…For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. Gal 5:1,13
 
Keith Ward

For help with this blog, click on FAQ and  Tutorial on the left sidebar.
Like us on facebook for tips, announcements, and quick links.

Jesus' Four Statements at Trial

Today’s article is by guest writer, Lucas Ward.
Just as it was prophesied in Isaiah, Jesus didn't speak much during His trial(s). In fact, He never once responded to any of His accusers.  Not the false witnesses at the Jewish sham trial, not the Chief Priests before Pilate or the Jews before Herod.  In all these cases, He stood mute.  His silence enraged the High Priest and astounded Pilate. (Mt. 26:62-63, 27:12-14)  In fact, the only times Jesus spoke were in answer to direct questions from the prosecutor/judge in reference to His identity.  Even then, His answers weren't what one would normally expect from a defendant.  Let's examine each of the four times He spoke and then see what conclusions we can draw.

Mat 26:63-64 "But Jesus remained silent.  And the high priest said to him, "I adjure you by the living God, tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God."  Jesus said to him, "You have said so.  But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.""  Notice that Jesus didn't merely answer in the affirmative, He went beyond that.  "Seated at the right hand of Power" can only mean with God and in fact is a claim that He not only was the Christ the son of God, but that he was fully divine and equal to God.  Who else could sit with Power?  He adds to that statement that they will see Him coming in the clouds of heaven.  Throughout the literary prophets, God coming in the clouds signified God coming in judgment to destroy a city or nation.  Jesus is saying, not only am I the Christ, I'm God and I'm going to come in judgment on you!  Immediately, the Sanhedrin declares that He is worthy of death for blasphemy (a charge which would have been true had anyone else uttered those words.)


Luk 22:67 ""If you are the Christ, tell us."  But he said to them, "If I tell you, you will not believe, and if I ask you, you will not answer.  But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God."  So they all said, "Are you the Son of God, then?" And he said to them, "You say that I am.""  One of the proofs that this session is separate from those recorded in Matthew and Mark is that the whole line of questioning  is different.  There are no false witnesses, and Jesus' answer to their question is a bit different.  This is the formal "official" trial, and they need to get His "blasphemy" on record.  This time when they ask, He tells them there is no point in answering, because they are too stubborn (and stupid?) to believe.  He then continues to say that He will be seated with God and finally confirms that He is the Son of God.  They again condemn Him to death.

Mat 27:11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the King of the Jews?"  Jesus said, "You have said so."  John gives a much fuller account, but this is sufficient.  Jesus claims to be a king to the Roman governor.

Joh 19:10-11 "So Pilate said to him, "You will not speak to me?  Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?"  Jesus answered him, "You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above. Therefore he who delivered me over to you has the greater sin.""  While there may have been some slight compassion for Pilate on Jesus' part here – after all, Pilate was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, unjust and self-interested as he was -- He seems also to be thumbing His nose at Pilate.  He tells Pilate that Pilate's power and authority count for nothing when dealing with Him, that Pilate would have no authority over Him except that God had so arranged it.

Do you see a theme threading through these statements by the Lord?  In every case, He said precisely what would enrage His questioners most.  Before the Jews, He not only claimed to be the Christ, the Son of God, but fully divine Himself and promised that He was coming in judgment upon them.  He later repeated most of that while hinting that they were too stubborn to believe the truth. Before Pilate, He claimed to be a king.  What was the primary responsibility of the Roman governors?  To keep the peace and stamp out insurrections before they could get started.  The fastest way to earn a death sentence was to claim to be a king and to gather followers around you. John records that not only did Jesus confirm to Pilate that He was a king, He also said that He had servants who would be willing to fight if He ordered it. While Pilate seems to have considered Jesus a harmless crazy person, this claim would have caused his antennae to twitch.  Finally, Jesus tells Pilate that he holds no true power over Him.  For a power hungry bureaucrat, this was a serious insult.  All of Jesus' answers seem to be designed to upset His judges in the worst way.

Unlike the case for most defendants, victory for Jesus entailed being convicted. His purpose was to be condemned to die. Always the master of what was going on around Him, He said exactly what He needed to in order to ensure that His condemnation came to pass. He wanted to be crucified and made sure that it happened, because that was the only way He could save us.

Lucas Ward

For help with this blog click on FAQ and Tutorial on the left sidebar.
Like us on facebook for announcements, tips, and quick links.

Just Say No

Today's post is by guest writer Keith Ward.

“Buried with Christ …. Dead to the old life …of sin.”
 
Don’t we just wish?  We sing the song.  We mean it sincerely.  We try to believe it really happened when we were baptized.  But, the reality that rots away our hope and that Satan twists to tempt us and bring us back down is that not much seems to have changed.  We proclaim that we have Christ and we come to church and we put on the front, but we are still tempted by the same old passions that we were last year, and the year before our conversion and that we did AGAIN last week and we wonder if our only hope is that our last prayer comes after the last time we yielded.  Boy, doesn’t the devil just love this attitude, “Just go ahead and give up,” he says.  We need to talk to each other and help each other.

Listen to the man who wrote the words behind the song above, “I have been crucified with Christ and it is no more I that lives, but Christ lives in me and the life I now live in the flesh, I live in faith in the Son of God who loved me and gave himself up for me.”  High and noble and don’t I just wish I was on that peak?

Some time later, Paul wrote. “I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage: lest by any means, after that I have preached to others, I myself should be rejected” (1Cor 9:27).  Though he had already penned Gal 2:20, Paul still struggled; so great a struggle that he called it beating himself into submission.

If Satan can get us depressed over our failures, we will repeat them.  We can triumph, but it is not easy.  It is not supposed to be.  We are in training to be a spiritual elite, not SEALS, Christians; not SWAT, children of God.  Tough training makes tough soldiers of faith.

Don’t give up.  Try harder.  Pray more.  Get a fellow soldier to help and help him.  Even Paul had to work at it.

“Just say NO!”  Nancy Reagan was mocked for her motto. It is God’s motto. I’ve seen the billboards, “What part of “Thou Shalt Not” did you not understand?”  If one believes in God, he must also believe that he is a created being, not a being that is the result of chance.  God says that the beings He created have a choice.  They can say, “NO!” to Satan.  God gave them this power.

Stop it with the excuses.

The mystery …now revealed to his saints. To them God chose to make known how great …are the riches of the glory of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory. [Col 1:26-27]

Keith Ward

For instructions on using this blog, click on FAQ and Tutorial on the left sidebar.

Figuring It Out

Today’s post is by guest writer Lucas Ward.

When Peter gets to Cornelius's house, he states that he wouldn't normally have attended a Gentile's invitation, "but God has shown me that I should not call any person common or unclean." (10:28) Wait! God never told him that! There is no place in the whole Bible where God tells Peter that he shouldn't call people common or unclean. It's just not there. However, Peter doesn't say God told him, he said God showed him. But again, God never showed him anything about people. Earlier in chapter ten God showed Peter a vision of animals and encourages Peter to "kill and eat".  Peter refuses, saying that he's never eaten anything unclean. This is where the heavenly voice says, "What God has made clean, do not call common." (vs 15) So, God showed Peter about animals and Peter figured out that He was talking about more than just animals. The Holy Spirit's instruction to go with these Gentiles and Cornelius's obvious humility and desire to learn things pointed to this conclusion. In fact, it was almost necessary that he infer this conclusion . . . .WAIT A MINUTE!

This is an almost perfect example of what preachers/teachers/theologians mean when they say "necessary inference".  While Peter was never out-and-out told that no person was common or unclean, he was given so many hints along those lines that any other conclusion was impossible. If he was thinking about God's revelations at all, then this was the conclusion he had to come to. This conclusion is later backed up by the Holy Spirit falling upon the Gentiles, proving that no man was common or unclean due to his race.  Also notice that this wasn't the product of wishful thinking on Peter's part, nor was it the result of taking one bit of revelation and twisting it beyond its original intent.  After Peter considered all that God had revealed to him on this subject, this was the only conclusion possible.

Another thing to look at is the first 18 verses of chapter 11. When the Jewish Christians accosted Peter in Jerusalem, he was not able to answer them in the way of the OT prophets; he could not say "Thus sayeth Jehovah" because God had never told him directly to do what was done with Cornelius. So, how did he answer?  He told them of the vision.  He told them that he was ordered to go with these men "nothing doubting" (the only direct verbal statement of God during this whole incident).  He recounts what Cornelius had told him regarding the angel's visit.  He tells of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon Cornelius and that the incident brought to mind a saying of Jesus.  He summed it all up by saying, "Who was I, that I could withstand God?" (11:17).  Upon hearing this, the Jewish Christians praised God that the Gospel was extended to the Gentiles, too.  But what was Peter's justification built on?  One generalized statement of the Lord and one statement by the Holy Spirit to go, one rather cryptic vision, a Gentile's claim to having seen an angel, and the rather emphatic proof of God's approval of what was going on. (By the time the Holy Spirit had fallen upon them, Peter had already preached the Gospel to them; he had already come to his conclusion by that point -- the Holy Spirit's outpouring was for the benefit of others.)  To understand what God wanted and approved of, Peter and the rest of the Jewish Christians examined all the evidence available, the whole of God's revelation on the subject to that point, and came to a conclusion. In other words, they had to exercise their gray matter upon the subject and think.

Yes, God expects us to think about His revelation and our religion. Isa 1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together, saith Jehovah: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."  God wants us to think, just as He implored the ancient Israelites.  The "wise of this world" scoff at religion and label it the domain of unthinking brutes -- and many do unthinkingly follow religious leaders to horrible ends -- but the religion God set up is a religion for thinkers.  Not that you have to be super smart.  Not that it is extremely difficult to understand.  But God has given us His word and expects us to understand it.  To do so, we must read and think about it.  Understand it as a whole, rather than wresting individual bits of it.  See what God is clearly implying about how we should live our lives.

Peter figured it out and he was an uneducated fishermen. Surely we can follow his example.

"It is important for doubters to understand that many of us believers came to the point of faith by first studying the evidence and using -- not abandoning -- our reasoning powers to analyze it. I discovered that to believe in Jesus Christ does not require us to discard our intellect." ----David Limbaugh "Jesus on Trial"

Lucas Ward